Biden’s Appropriations Budget Proposal Is Unreasonable, Irresponsible

0

After proposing a massive $2 trillion tax-and-spending binge, President Joe Biden released his budget request for fiscal year 2022 discretionary appropriations.

This so-called “skinny budget” proposal would drive up wasteful spending, shortchange actual priorities such as national security, and increase the likelihood of the appropriations bills not being passed through regular order.

The budget is unreasonable and irresponsible, and Congress should instead chart its own course for the fiscal 2022 appropriations process.

For the past decade, the Budget Control Act had established the maximum topline levels for defense and nondefense categories of discretionary spending. However, for fiscal 2022, there are no limits on discretionary spending established in law.

Now that the Budget Control Act has expired, there’s not yet an agreement on what the overall spending level should be. Nevertheless, we do know that this agreement must be reached on a bipartisan basis.

While Biden is attempting to implement most of his partisan agenda through the budget reconciliation process, which can be enacted with just 51 votes in the Senate, discretionary spending does not qualify for reconciliation.

That means the appropriations bills will be subject to the normal 60-vote thresholds to advance in the Senate. Lawmakers from both parties will be required to work together to complete the appropriations process.

Biden’s budget request represents a massive increase in spending from current levels.

In total, Biden proposes $1.5 trillion in discretionary spending for fiscal 2022, a $124 billion increase above the non-emergency amount provided in fiscal 2021. That represents a 9% increase, higher than the increases in prices, wages, population, or the economy.

This unreasonable and irresponsible proposal will not attract the support needed from across the aisle. 

Perhaps even more important than the topline spending levels are what the taxpayers’ hard-earned dollars are to be spent on. On that score, Biden’s budget request gets a failing grade.

Agencies known for promulgating job-killing regulations, such as the Internal Revenue Service, the Environmental Protection Agency, and the Department of Labor, would see substantial increases in spending authority.

The Department of Education would be in line for an increase of more than 40%, on top of the unprecedented federal funding sent to the education establishment over the past year, even as the teachers unions have opposed resuming in-person schooling.

The president even proposes using taxpayer funds to attack Americans’ constitutionally protected rights, by creating new programs to incentivize states to enact gun control laws.

At the same time as these low-priority programs see increases, the president’s budget proposes to shortchange constitutional priorities, such as our national security.

In one positive development, the budget does propose shifting planned spending that had previously been designated Overseas Contingency Operations as a way to fund military requirements and get around spending caps back into the base budget, as has been recommended by The Heritage Foundation.

But this reform is overshadowed by the expansion of the Pentagon’s mission into things like climate change without providing adequate resources for defense needs.

Instead of this irresponsible budget proposal, Congress should follow a very different path for the fiscal 2022 appropriations process.

Congress must exercise spending restraint. The federal government spent $6 trillion in the past year in the name of COVID-19 (even if much of this spending had nothing to do with addressing the pandemic) on top of the already unsustainable budget. And the president has recently released a massive $2 trillion tax-and-spending proposal.

Instead of new spending, it is important for Congress to start implementing a responsible budget.

Lawmakers should carefully review the budget and wind down programs that do not carry out the proper constitutional powers of the federal government and are otherwise unnecessary. At the same time, Congress should ensure that important priorities receive responsible funding levels.

Vital riders, such as the long-standing Hyde Amendment to protect taxpayers from paying for abortions, must be included.

Finally, Congress should not include earmarks in the spending bills. Despite an effort to rebrand them with the euphemism “community project funding,” there is nothing more emblematic of the proverbial Washington “swamp” than earmarks.

Earmarks encourage wasteful spending, spawn corruption, and are not a viable tool for properly exercising Congress’ Article I powers or for ensuring regular-order legislating.

Importantly, the Senate Republican Conference rules ban earmarks. Because the votes of Senate Republicans will be necessary to pass the appropriations bills, those bills should not include earmarks.

Biden’s budget request should be disregarded, and the Congress should chart a responsible path forward to complete the appropriations process. 

Have an opinion about this article? To sound off, please email [email protected] and we will consider publishing your remarks in our regular “We Hear You” feature. 

View original post